LASTEST NEWS ITM KAIST의 최신 소식을 알려 드립니다.
공지 2
[석사학위 논문심사 안내] 2026년 6월 19일(금) 오후 2시~ / 김준석 석사과정 (학번:20244179) 기술경영전문대학원 석사학위 논문심사를 아래와 같이 안내합니다.  1. 학    과: 기술경영전문대학원 2. 학 생 명: 김준석  (학번 : 20244179) 3. 논문제목:  (국문) 텍스트 기반 거버넌스 공시-인식 격차와 미래 거버넌스 논란 (영문) Text-Based Governance Disclosure-Perception Gap and Future Governance Controversies 4. Abstract :  This thesis examines whether a text-based discrepancy between formal overnance/control disclosure and employee-side governance salience predicts future governance controversies. I construct a Governance Disclosure Perception Gap as the year-standardized governance salience of 10-K Item 9A, the section on controls and procedures, minus the year-standardized governance salience of Glassdoor Pros. Using a firm-year panel combining Glassdoor reviews, 10-K filings, RepRisk incident data, stock returns, and financial controls for U.S. firms from 2013 to 2022, with RepRisk outcomes extended through 2024, I test whether this gap contains leading information about governance-related controversies and capital-market outcomes. The main complete-case sample contains 4,738 firm-year observations and 487 firms. Results from fixed-effects models show that a larger gap is positively associated with future RepRisk governance controversy at the two-year horizon. The gap predicts controversy occurrence, reach, severity, and reach × severity, while evidence for simple incident count is weaker. A one-standard-deviation increase in the gap corresponds to an approximately 3.26 percentage-point increase in future incident probability. In contrast, the gap provides limited evidence as a direct stock-return predictor and does not moderate the relation between RepRisk controversies and stock returns. Robustness and decomposition analyses suggest that occurrence is more disclosure-side driven, whereas future severity and intensity are more consistent with a mismatch between formal controls-and-procedures disclosure and employee-side governance salience. Overall, the gap is best interpreted as an early-warning indicator of future governance controversy rather than evidence of intentional misrepresentation. 5. 심사위원장: 조항정 교수님 6. 심사위원: 김륜희 교수님, 김의석 교수님 7. 심사일시: 2026년  6월 19일 (금요일)  오후 2시 8. 심사장소: N5 동  2113 호  

등록일2026.06.06.

공지 3
[박사학위논문심사안내]2026년 5월 27일(수요일) 오후2시/조혜정박사과정(학번:20115353) 기술경영전문대학원 박사학위 논문심사를 아래와 같이 안내합니다.   1. 학 과: 기술경영전문대학원2. 학 생 명: 조혜정 (학번 : 20115353) 3. 논문제목: (국문) 고학력 R&D 전문가의 리더십에 관한 연구: 과학적 마인드셋 척도 개발 및 활용(영문) Exploring Leadership for Highly Educated R&D Professionals: Development and Application of a Scientific Mindset Scale 4. Abstract As knowledge-intensive growth strategies become central to national competitiveness, the effective management of R&D professionals has emerged as a critical organizational challenge. R&D professionals possess distinctive psychological and cognitive characteristics, including strong professional self-confidence in their research domain and a heightened demand for autonomy, that render conventional human resource management (HRM) frameworks poorly suited to research environments. Yet empirical research that takes R&D professionals as its primary subject remains sparse, and measurement tools calibrated to their distinctive dispositional profile have not been sufficiently accumulated in the existing literature. This dissertation addresses two interrelated research questions through two independent but sequentially connected empirical studies conducted with researchers at Korean government-funded research institutes. The first study theorizes the construct of Scientific Mindset, defined as a multidimensional constellation of cognitive, personality, motivational, and attitudinal characteristics that underpin stable scientific thinking in actual R&D task contexts, and develops a psychometrically validated scale to measure it. Scale development proceeded followed a multi-stage procedure encompassing theory-based item generation, expert content review, a pilot survey, and a nationwide main survey; exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were subsequently applied to evaluate factor structure, reliability, and construct validity. The second study empirically examines how transformational and transactional leadership, each disaggregated into their respective subdimensions, influence R&D professionals’ Creative Process Engagement (CPE) through Scientific Mindset as the mediating mechanism. CPE is conceptualized as a process-level indicator of creativity encompassing problem definition, information searching, and idea generation, rendering it more proximal to creative output than conventional performance metrics. The findings indicate that Scientific Mindset operates as a meaningful psychological pathway linking leadership to CPE, and that transactional leadership can facilitate rather than constrain creative engagement when it functions in conjunction with Scientific Mindset. This dissertation contributes to strengthening the theoretical and practical foundations of leadership and HRM in R&D environments. 5. 심사위원장: 조항정6. 심사위원: 김의석, 박명철, 송찬후, 이덕희7. 심사일시: 2026년 5월 27일(수요일) 오후 2시 8. 심사장소: N5동 2113호

등록일2026.05.08.

SCROLL
ITM KAIST INTERVIEW 카이스트 기술경영전문대학원의
동문, 동료 및 교수진의 이야기.